Hyder Quarterfinal Report: Razik Comes Through In Tiebreakers Against Ball by Rob Dinerman, for DailySquashReport.com
Dateline May 18th, 2012
---- In a remarkable display of the grace and coolness under pressure
that have always characterized his game, top seed Shahier Razik
defeated Bradley Ball 12-10 11-4 15-13 in the first and most formidable
quarterfinal match played this evening in the 44th annual Quentin Hyder
Invitational. Ball led 9-8 in the opening game and saved four
match-balls against him in the third, but Razik, as had been the case
in his semifinal wins over Ball the past two years in this tournament,
had all the answers in the grinding end-games, while a fully engrossed
crowd at the Harvard Club Of New York watched with awe and admiration
as these two superb athletes battled for nearly an hour of high-paced
and (other than in the second game) closely contested all-court action.
The first
game alone consumed 19 minutes, with Ball pounding his drives (which
often have his full extension and leverage behind them), forcing the
play as much as he could, and fully living up to the “BradAttack” logo
on his shirt, while Razik, currently ranked No. 34 on the PSA pro tour
after playing No. 1 on the Canadian team this past summer in the
biennial World Team Championships, extemporized as only he can, lobbing
his way out of trouble, frustrating his larger and more muscular (but
still amazingly mobile) opponent by getting to shots that would have
been winners against virtually anyone else, counter-punching with
telling effect and committing fewer than a handful of unforced errors
during the entire match. Indeed, it was this latter difference that
proved Ball’s undoing in the first game’s closing stretch after he had
clawed and arm-fought his way to a 9-8 advantage, only to lose his
final four points (bisected by a stroke call in his favor that knotted
the game at 10) on tins, the last of which came when he tried to lash a
shoulder-high backhand volley into the front-right nick. He hits the
ball with explosive severity but that style can cause fatigue in both
his opponent and himself, sometimes (as in this stretch) with metallic
results, abetted no doubt by an awareness of how perfectly struck any
attempted winner has to be to succeed against Razik’s nearly
impenetrable defensive barricade.
Certainly
one got the sense at 10-all; that Ball HAD to have that first-set
tiebreaker, i.e. that he had worked too hard, played too well and was
breathing too heavily for him to afford to lose that overtime session
and still have a realistic chance to win the match, and when it slipped
away from him, it may have carried over to the second game as well,
during the early part of which Razik’s nearly invisible but inexorable
pressure rose to the fore as from 1-3 he won five straight point, part
of a 10-1 game-closing run built on several misdirection winners when
Ball (who also contributed five tins to Razik’s spurt) moved too early,
trying to get a head start on Razik’s anticipated shot and allowing the
lithe Canadian to wrist-flick the ball into the vacated territory.
To Ball’s
credit, his mental toughness, which had abandoned him in that second
game, returned with a vengeance in the third, as did his energy level
and the punishing force of his powerful drives, resulting in a series
of lengthy and compellingly hard fought points (mostly along the left
wall) and a score that seesawed tensely along, with neither player
having more than a one-point lead by mid-game. Ball, whose highly
effective game is mostly premised on driving the ball into a side-wall
nick, actually scored better when he resorted to SOFT drop shots
(well-suited to the host venue’s relatively “slow” front wall) which
forced Razik to take an extra step to the front wall and left him out
of position for the following volley (though few people in the world
can make up that extra ground the way Razik can). Ball never was able
to get to game-ball, but, as noted, he fended off match-ball
opportunities for Razik at 10-9, 11-10, 12-11 and 13-12, on two of
those occasions benefiting from tight no-let calls after close-quarters
exchanges along the left wall.
Ball had
similarly survived a third-game match-ball-against predicament when
this pair played each other in this event a year ago, and wound up
winning that game before Razik had closed out the match in the fourth.
But this time, at 13-all, after a fantastic front-left get by Razik,
Ball hit his volley right down the middle for a stroke call against
him, followed by another stroke call on the subsequent point, a
somewhat anticlimactic ending to what was nevertheless a riveting
match, two games of which were right on the edge of landing in Ball’s
ledger.
In the remaining three quarterfinal matches:
World #41 Zac Alexander of Australia needed the full five to take care of rising star Andrew McDougall
of Calgary. Alexander, who arrived at the Hyder directly from the
British Open qualifying, pulled out an 11-9 fourth game before winning
11-4 in the fifth.
Alexander d McDougall 8-11 11-9 9-11 11-9 11-4
Alexander's NY-based Australian training partner Ryan Cuskelly,
also returning from the British Open where he successfully qualified
into the main draw before losing in four to England's Peter Barker,
beat L. Mosope in straight games.
Cuskelly d Mosope 11-7 12-10 11-5
And second seeded Wael El Hindi of the PST had his way with Columbia coach Jacques Swanepoel, also in straights.
El Hindi d Swanepoel 11-9 11-5 11-4
Saturday's Semifinal Matchups, at SportsClub LA: 5:00 Shahier Razik v Zac Alexander 6:00 Ryan Cuskelly v Wael El Hindi